Microsoft may have just created a new term, though I doubt it would want credit for the feat. The tech giant “morged” a diagram as part of a “careless” and “blatantly amateuristic” attempt to rip off a graphic created over a decade ago.
Vincent Driessen, a software engineer, playfully claimed that Microsoft “morged” his diagram after it was discovered AI was used to poorly plagiarize a graphic.
The original diagram shared by Vincent Driessen.
Image credit: Microsoft (based on original graphic by Vincent Driessen)
A diagram shared by Microsoft that appears to have been generated with AI.
Image credit: Vincent Driessen
“The AI rip-off was not just ugly. It was careless, blatantly amateuristic, and lacking any ambition, to put it gently. Microsoft unworthy,” said Driessen. “The carefully crafted visual language and layout of the original, the branch colors, the lane design, the dot and bubble alignment that made the original so readable—all of it had been muddled into a laughable form. Proper AI slop.”
Morged is not the first AI-related slang to be connected to Microsoft. The term “Microslop” trended on social media earlier this year. Perhaps Microsoft should form a partnership with Urban Dictionary to keep track of the slang. Maybe integrate Urban Dictionary with Copilot?
AI tools often struggle with generating text. Even when given explicit instructions to include certain characters, generated text often looks janky. “Typos” are common as well, if that term can be used when typing is not involved.
Oh god yes, Microsoft continvoucly
morged my diagram there for sure 😬— @nvie.com (@nvie.com.bsky.social) 2026-02-19T15:28:24.542Z
The GitHub page’s inclusion of the graphic gained traction on social media. Scott Hanselman, Vice President of Developer Community at Microsoft, replied to Driessen on Bluesky.
Hanselman stated that it appears an “overzealous vendor” created the graphic. The VP promised a post-mortem that will try to determine what happened and expressed the need for guidelines and guard rails to be put in place to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Understood. Not trying to sweep under rugs, but I also want to point out that everything is moving very fast right now and there’s 300,000 people that work here, so there’s probably be a bunch of dumb stuff happening. There’s also probably a bunch of dumb stuff happening at other companies
— @scott.hanselman.com (@scott.hanselman.com.bsky.social) 2026-02-19T15:28:24.592Z
Hanselman stuck around in the thread for a while responding to questions and comments about the situation. His last comment on the thread states that “Sometimes it’s a big systemic problem and sometimes it’s just one person who screwed up.”
I agree with Driessen’s statement that this situation is disappointing. The engineer said,
“I find this whole thing mostly very saddening. Not because some company used my diagram. As I said, it’s been everywhere for 15 years and I’ve always been fine with that. What’s dispiriting is the (lack of) process and care: take someone’s carefully crafted work, run it through a machine to wash off the fingerprints, and ship it as your own. This isn’t a case of being inspired by something and building on it. It’s the opposite of that. It’s taking something that worked and making it worse. Is there even a goal here beyond “generating content”?”
Driessen also highlighted that his diagram was well-known and that the ripoff was poorly made and clearly generated by AI, so people flagged it. There are many pieces of plagiarized, AI generated content that will go unnoticed.
